No child left behind Essay

No Child Is Left derriere (NCLB) is a federal state act of 2001 which was proposed by the then president, George W. supply immediately after being inaugurated in to the White House. This legal framework was aimed at ensuring that the primary and lower-ranking procreation placement was meliorated by advocating for increased accountability and transp arency in its management. It further cogitate on the discipline system increased the flexibility on how fires washstand choose the schooling basis their siblings will attend. This paper provides a broad overview of the act and it let ins its history, scope, campaigner tough ch bothenges, among other issues.Brief news of the relevant history The law was authored by John Boehner and Judd Gregg, a representative and a senator respectively from the republican Party and George miller and Edward Kennedy, a senator respectively from the Democratic Party. It was then signed by G. W. bush. Beside aiming at ameliorate the performanc e primary and alternative commandment and increasing accountability, improved the focus on reading and re-authored the 1965 primary and Secondary Act. The act was brought forward in the 107th congress whereby it was illuminateed in the House of Representatives and US senate on 2001, may 23rd and 2004, June 14th respectively.It was later signed in to law on 2002, January 8th. Scope The act was brought to the calcium hydroxide light after realization the quality of the information being offered was directly affecting the school-age small frys, parents and all the citizens at large. At the international level, since the world was becoming a global village as a chair of globalization, the quality of tuition needed to improved since many of the Americans children had little hope in the future due to high levels of illiteracy and low self esteem (self doubt).The act was of paramount essence since the US, the world largest economic system needed to produce intellectuals that w ould translate America and the globe at large. Context (historical, political, economic, social) At the quantify George W. Bush introduced this blueprint, he noned that though the American was entering the 21st century with a lot of call up and hope, many of the children who were in need of education support and aid were being ignored and thereby left-hand(a) around. 70% of the fourth graders residing in the inner city could not read or even pass the national reading trial which involved the elementary level of education.The senior high school student in other parts of the world, S let stunnedh Africa and Cyprus to be specific perform very sickly on the international mathematics screen. Almost a 1/3 of the college freshmen of American origin take dogmatic remedial courses prior to initiating the regular college level courses It is the responsibility of the parents, state and all the citizens to ensure that quality education is guaranteed for all the American children in la unch to have a bright future.This has not been the case and the coupled Sates Federal Government is to be blamed for condoning the poor results and failing to delivery the failure in the education system. The federal giving medication has controlled the Americans, schools since through education policies since 1965 when the first major(ip) initiative on the elementary secondary was undertaken. Since then the federal government has established so many programs/ projects geared towards facilitation of quality education. A major drawback for these programs is that the results have not been analyzed to appreciate whether the programs achieve their objectives or not.Another factor for the failure of the programs is that they are formulated by the congress and the topical anaesthetics are not consulted, as a result, local population education needs are not addressed. There have been programs that are formulated for every single education program and this had led to a pile of programs across the federal states. These programs costed the federal government hundred billions apiece year but quality of education on the other hand has been falling since the objectives are not being realized. This has resulted to a wide and an increasing gap between the rich and the poor in America.confront with this dilemma, both(prenominal) citizens have proposed that the federal government should not be involved the education sector. Another harmonise of the population suggests that the new programs should be added to the onetime(a) education system. , the federal government was therefore require to arrange up with effective programs and projects which would restore confidence in to the American education system. After a braining hunting of the take up option, the federal government came up with the No Child is Left croupe constitution which would transform the American education system.During the signing of the bill, the then US president, George W. Bush said Weve got la rge challenges here in America. Theres no greater challenge than to make sure that every child and all of us on this stage mean every child, not just a few children, every single child, regardless of where they live, how theyre raised, the income level of their family, every child receive a first-class education in America. Individuals/agencies involved including a discussion of the major decision makersThe No Child is Left privy form _or_ system of government would involve a number of parties in order to transform the American education system, these entities include o The t individuallyers o The parents o The local citizens o The federal government The teachers will be involved in ensuring the No Child is Left nookie polity work. They will be trained to improve their quality. The schools that will perform headspring will be requiteed while those not achieving the expected results will be sanctioned. The federal government is expected to fund the training of school teachers and improve the schools in general.The parents are required to monitor the performance of their children and at the same time access more information concerning the performance of his/her child from the school administration. Additional funds will be provided to the state and district schools by so that they can become more flexible. The local society is required to ensure that it provide a conducive learning environment so that the students can utilize their potential to the best of their capability (Hammond 2007). Major stakeholders involved (who the policy/issue affects, who has an interest in the policy)Among the major stakeholders who will be involved and will be change by the NCLB will include the students, the teachers, parent, the local authorities and the federal government. The teachers will be required to play a crucial role in ensuring that the gap between the poor and rich is closed by ensuring that they maintain high standards and accountability, offering annual scho olman assessment to children which will then be evaluated by the parents. The teachers are further required to give reading a priority.The parents are expected to work nigh with the teachers so that they can assist in progress of the children education. The parents flexibility and option for schools will in like manner increase. The local authorities are expected to guarantee the teacher protection, promote school safety, rescue the schools from the schools that are not safe and advocate for character education. o The federal government is expected to provide funds and reward to the well performing schools and states in terms of accountability and transparency.The government will also give the teachers some initiatives like tax deduction in order to promote their performance. The role public administrators play in the policy/issue The public administers are expected to ensure that the funds provided by the federal government are utilized in the most efficient was possible while at the same time making certain that they reach the targeted entities. The public administrators are further expected to evaluate the performance of the school.They should also give feedback to the federal government on matter concerning the effectiveness of the No Child is Left Behind policy in meeting the academic needs of the American people (Samier, et, al, 2008). Policy alternatives and solutions Currently this is the best education program that has been formulated in the US. Proper implementation of the program will ensure that it becomes sodding(a) since it will be evaluated from time to time. Corrective measure will be put in say to ensure that the expected results are achieved. Challenges facing policy implementation and solutionThe policy is faced with a number of challenges prior to its implementation. One of major critic is on the use of standards to gauge the performance of the states and schools. The schools or each state can lower their standards so that they cam purp ort to have improved in their performance. This is because each state has the capacity to set its own standards. This means that the incentives and penalties (sanctions) provided by the government would end up on the hand of wrong persons. This problem therefore calls for standardization of the examination if at all there is an medical prognosis of correct un parti prised results (Uzzell (2005).The use of standardized within states reduced the quality of education since the teachers teach the test to ensure that the students performs well in the schools. They, teachers, only teach the areas that are expected to be tested in the final standard exams. The standardized tests are also against Individuals With Disabilities Education Act. The tests have also been condemned of promoting cultural bias since different culture value certain skills than others. To avoid this kind of bias, the policy of standardized test should be re-evaluated in depth and a sustainable standard established (A bernathy 2007).The issue of offering incentives to the schools performing poorly(predicate) enables the schools to continue performing poorly. The schools that are rewarded after performing well in the standards test is likely to push button out the poorly performing students so that hey can maintain the standards. In order to ensure that the poorly performing schools improve they should be offered with technical expertise and not financial resources. The top performing schools on the other hand should be closely monitored to ensure that the poor students are not expelled on academic grounds.The No Child is Left Behind policy focuses manly on the core subjects, that is English and Mathematics, this has do the student to improve in these two subjects while the other broader education is lost. This therefore requires the NCLB policy to be considerate of other skills and subjects to ensure that education meets its purpose (Menken 2008). Importance of the No Child is Left Behind poli cy Its enables the children to understand the policies that have been implemented in the efforts to improve the quality of education in order to face the global challenges in bold.Precisely, the understanding of this policy enables a person to understand the existing education policys roots, challenges and its core values. This policy is also an indication of the federal government interest in leading the global by providing its citizens with quality education which will ensure that the illiteracy level decreases significantly. The policy also explains in details the expected level of participation by all the parties involved in ensuring that it is a success. The policy also explains the importance of the accountability and transparency for any program or policy to succeed (Peterson, et, al, 2003).Overview of the important values Irrespective of the stake holders involved in implementing this policy, is of great significance to evaluate the important values of the No Child is Left B ehind policy. This policy is expected to o issuing to grades for tests o General improvement of all the standards o Increased accountability of all resources in the schools o Creating opportunity for the minority groups o General improvement of the quality of education o Offering the parent the option to select school for children o Guarantying of the federal funding ConclusionThough the change is well formulated, it needs to be cleansed off some of the issues that are raising eyebrows. It needs to be refined to address all the children depending on their needs. The policy provides clearly detailed guidelines which will ensure that the quality of the education system in America greatly improves to solve the ever increasing global challenges. While comparing the old and the new education programs, this new NCLB is likely to have better results since it focus on all the children with vehemence on the children from the minority groups.The local population, citizens and the federal go vernment should ensure that the proper implementation and evaluation is carried out to make certain that the best results are achieved. As time passes by, a research should be carried out to find out area or clauses that need to be changed for upgrading of the programs.References Abernathy Scott Franklin (2007) No Child Left Behind and the Public Schools, Michigan, University of Michigan Press, (pp 130-149). Hammond Linda D. (2007) Evaluating No Child Left Behind retrieved on 18th, November, 2008, lendable at http//www. thenation.com/ commercialism/20070521/darling-hammond Menken Kate (2008) English Learners Left Behind Standardized Testing as Language Policy, NY, Multilingual Matters Press (pp 118-140) Samier Eugenie Angele, Stanley go (2008) Political Approaches to Educational Administration and Leadership, NY, Routledge, (pp 139-154) Peterson Paul E. , West Martin R. (2003) No Child Left Behind? The government and Practice of School Accountability, Brookings, Brookings Institu tion Press, (pp13-14) Smith Marilyn Cochran (2004) Walking the Road Race, Diversity, and Social Justice in instructor Teachers College Press (p 157)The white house, Foreword by President George W. Bush, retrieved on 18th, November, 2008, available at http//www. whitehouse. gov/news/reports/no-child-left-behind. hypertext mark-up language The White House, President Signs Landmark No Child Left Behind Education Bill, retrieved on 18th, November, 2008, available at http//www. whitehouse. gov/news/releases/2002/01/20020108-1. html Uzzell Lawrence A. (2005) No Child Left Behind The Dangers of Centralized Education Policy, retrieved on 18th, November, 2008, available at http//www. cato. org/pub_display. php? pub_id=3769