ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR THEORIES OR MODELS Essay

ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR THEORIES OR MODELS - Essay ExampleDiverse individuals or employees behave distinguishablely and hence the organizational sort rump be defined as the sum total of the conducts of the diverse employees. As a result of that, it is logical to assume that no two organizations can be alike in terms of its behavior since no two individuals are alike in their behaviors. The culture, religion, and the attitudes of the employees can play vital fictitious characters in do organizational behavior. Leadership plays an important role in shaping organizational behavior. Ultimately leaders are responsible for the development of good as sanitary as bad behaviors and attitudes among employees. An employee who gets good treatment from the leader may contribute heavily to the organization whereas an employee who gets bad treatment from the leader may retard the hap of the organization. Strategies necessary to motivate a diverse workforce purely depend on the abilities of t he leader. In other words, leadership style plays an important role in shaping organizational behavior. Some leaders have autocratic in nature whereas some others are democratic in nature. A third member of leaders adopt a mixed approach autocratic style blended with democratic style. Based on these leadership styles, plenty of organizational behavior theories or models were developed in the recent past. This paper critically analyses situational leadership theory, the XY theory of motivation and Adams equity theory of motivation to be more about the organizational behavior theories or models. Situational Leadership theory and organizational behavior The situational leadership theory, was developed by Paul Hersey, (author of the book Situational Leader), and consciousness Blanchard, (author of The One Minute Manager). The core principle of the situational leadership theory is that the leaders should be flexible enough to change their styles based on the demands of the situations (Hersey and Blanchard, 1977). The four different types of situational leadership are Directing, Coaching, Supporting and Delegating. Directing leadership approach is most appropriate when the followers have low willingness and low ability for the task at have. When the followers cannot do the job and are unwilling or afraid to try, then the leader must take a highly directive role (The Situational Leadership Model, N.d., p.3). It should be noted that power is extremely important for a military leader. He will exercise it whenever requires. It is the duty of the soldiers or the followers to attend the commands or instructions of the commander or leader, even if they have concerns about the logic and utility of the instructions they got. First obey and then question is the mold followed in military. Coaching leadership approach is most appropriate when the followers have high willingness but low ability for the task at hand (The Situational